What option best describes Sam's situation during the meeting, according to the conversation?

The most accurate description of Sam's situation during the meeting is that he should have been there. This implies that Sam was expected to attend the meeting, suggesting that his presence was important for the discussion that took place. The context might indicate that his absence had implications for the meeting's dynamics or outcomes.

The option indicating he is currently there would imply he had arrived in time, which does not align with the context suggesting he was not present. The choice stating he was late to arrive would also not fit if the conversation revolves around him having missed part of the meeting altogether. Lastly, stating he was absent would be incorrect if the focus is more on the expectation of his presence rather than the fact that he did not attend at all. Hence, "he should have been there" highlights the anticipated need for his attendance rather than simply stating his absence or tardiness.